|
|
|
Blog of the Mohawk River Research Center, Inc. Updated every month. |
|
|
Entries: 1 - 5 of 8
First
|
< Prev
|
Next >
|
Last
Entry for July 31, 2008
Move Over Hudson!
Sometimes I ask myself, how did I wind up on the board of the Mohawk River Research Center?
You see, I love the Hudson River. Love it. I’ve invested a lot of my academic, professional, and personal life into understanding the Hudson River. From the moment that the craggy and dramatic slopes of Breakneck Ridge and Storm King came into view and took my breath on my first trip to the Hudson Valley, I fell in love with the Hudson. As an educator for Riverkeeper, I was immersed in the river’s history and ecology. For three years, I lived aboard the Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, intimate with the ebbs and flows of the estuary. I’ve mucked in the wetlands. I’ve kicked over rocks in the tributaries. I’ve been a pilgrim on the paths to Lake Tear of the Clouds on Tahawus. I can show you where the Continental Army strung the chains across the river. I can tell you the history of Bannerman’s Castle. I can tell you how a hogchoker got its name. Even now in my work for New York State, I spend most of my time focused on the Hudson.
What amazes me as I reflect upon my wonderful memories and experiences on the Hudson River is that I know almost nothing about the Mohawk River. The Mohawk is the largest tributary of the Hudson River, and as much as I would preach to others about watershed connections, I must admit I never thought much about the Mohawk. Like many others who have worked on the Hudson River Estuary, I had become a Hudson River Snob. It’s not really intentional, but when you work on the Hudson the Mohawk ends up lost, forgotten, neglected, like the poor little brother lost in the shadows of his big brother who gets all the glory. And you know what? The Mohawk deserves better. After all, for better or worse, the Hudson and Mohawk are linked, and the Hudson wouldn’t be what it is without its pesky little brother.
I said before that I know almost nothing about the Mohawk River, but I guess I would have to say that I used to know almost nothing about the Mohawk. Since joining the board of the MRRC my eyes have been opened to the rich history, scenic beauty, and ecological significance of the Mohawk. So, it was with great pride that I accepted my first official duty as a board member representing the MRRC at the Hudson River Watershed Alliance meeting held July 1 in Beacon, NY.
Twenty-five Hudson River watershed associations of various sizes, histories, and organizational structures attended. I never cease to be inspired by the members of these small watershed groups, many of whom are volunteers, and what they are able to accomplish with virtually no resources except a deep passion for their stream and an unshakeable will to make things better. The Hudson River Estuary Program has done a great service to both the river and those who try and keep it clean by organizing this alliance. Here groups have a network of experience to draw upon when they encounter the inevitable hurdles of creating a functional and vital watershed association.
I felt a little funny speaking as the lone voice of the Mohawk River, a self-admitted (and reforming) Hudson River Snob amid a room full of Hudson River enthusiasts, in the historic Beacon Sloop club - Pete Seeger’s hometown - with the Clearwater gently rocking at the dock right outside. Some among the crowd were genuinely surprised to see a Mohawk River group there. One participant said with more than a hint of sarcasm, “How nice of the Estuary Program to recognize the Mohawk as part of the Hudson River watershed,” but for the most part people were interested in what I had to say and how our small organization fit into the larger vision of the Hudson River Watershed. I did my best to answer questions about the Mohawk. The most common question I fielded was, “Where is your research center?” To which I replied, “Umm…we don’t really have one…yet!”
Aside from a tasty lunch, a sail on the Clearwater, and a send-off serenade from none other than Pete Seeger himself, I did manage to do some work. I made some good contacts. I met some folks involved in the Mohawk Hudson Land Conservancy that were interested in partnering with MRRC. I look forward to crossing paths with all of the committed watershed stewards I met in the future. And as the Hudson River Estuary Management Program has demonstrated, an organization like the Hudson River Watershed Alliance can serve as an important clearinghouse for information, experience, and support. As I sat listening to the stories of these small watershed associations, I could clearly envision MRRC as an important technical support organization for sub-basin groups on the Mohawk to launch their own water quality monitoring programs. The Mohawk is a big watershed and there is more than enough room for a few watershed groups, and MRRC is poised to be a key player in developing a similar alliance on the Mohawk.
So, I am excited. I am excited to be a part of this Mohawk River crowd. I look forward to discovering the awe along the Mohawk and stumbling upon those hidden gems and special moments that only time and luck reveal. I want to search the potholes above Cohoes Falls. I want to paddle the Saratoga Trail. I want to take the Revolutionary Mohawk tour. While the Mohawk may never eclipse the Hudson in popularity, the Mohawk is rising and I am proud to count myself among those who are protecting the ecology and heritage of the Mohawk through research and education.
Sean Madden
Entry for July 30, 2008
One hundred years ago today, George Schuster Sr. won the greatest automobile race the world has ever known traveling some 22,000 miles from New York to Paris in 169 days. The race began in New York City on February 12, 1908 to the delight of 250,000 spectators in Times Square. Schuster’s Thomas Flyer automobile, manufactured in Buffalo, NY, was first to arrive in Albany at noon of the second race day. The winter of 1908 was particularly harsh in the northeast and since no snow plows existed at the time, the planned Rt. 5 route from Albany to Buffalo was abandoned in favor of the barge canal tow path through much of the Mohawk Valley. The path being elevated above the surrounding land resulted in much of the snow being blown off the path to the point where it was navigable (barely). Schuster and the Flyer spent the night of the 13th in Fonda and passed through Utica on the 14th arriving in Buffalo on the 16th.
To commemorate the 100th anniversary of the race, “The Great Auto Race Celebration Tour”, will start in New York City on October 18, 2008 and finish in Los Angeles, California, on November 1. This tour will follow as close as possible to the original route across the United States and will pass though the Mohawk Valley on October 19th. For more information on the Great Auto Race and centennial celebration visit http://www.thegreatautorace.com/
Entry for April 2, 2008
The Arkell Museum in Canajoharie, New York
The premier museum of Mohawk River art is the Arkell Museum in Canajoharie, New York, which re-opened in its new home in September, 2007. The museum collection features many paintings of the Mohawk River Valley and the Erie Canal, and includes William Wall’s 1862 painting "New York and the Erie Canal". The logo of the Mohawk River Research Center is based on the famous view in this painting. The painting is also enlarged into a mural in the Great Hall of the museum.
The Great Hall of the Arkell Museum features a large floor map of the Mohawk River Valley, illustrating cities and land formations of the basin. Ongoing programs at the museum include a historical activity in which participants are encouraged to locate Mohawk Valley scenes depicted in illustrations in the exhibit, and then photograph them as they look today.
The permanent collection of the museum includes works by Winslow Homer, George Inness, William Merritt Chase, Childe Hassam, Mary Cassatt, Georgia O’Keeffe, Robert Henri, and Thomas Hart Benton. More information about the museum can be found at their website: www.arkellmuseum.org.
Entry for February 12, 2008 
The Mohawk River basin can be divided into 53 smaller Hydrologic Units (called HUCs) which are usually watersheds of tributaries. From time to time we will look at individual HUCs. The Fox Creek HUC straddles Albany and Schoharie Counties. It covers parts of the towns of Schoharie, Wright, Knox, Bern, Rensselaerville, and Westerloo. It is largely wooded or in agriculture. The HUC has an area 296 sq km and a 2000 population of 5,798. Fox Creek flows into Schoharie Creek just north of the village of Schoharie. Tributaries to the Fox include Beaver Dam Creek, Switz Kill, and the Louse Kill. There are no industrial facilities reporting to the Environmental Protection Agency’s Toxic Release Inventory. The Louse Kill gets its name from the migration of the Palatines into the Schoharie Valley. These people, so important in the early settlement of the Mohawk River Basin, came to the New York
Colony as refugees from poverty, persecution, and war in the Protestant German speaking provinces in 1709. They were expected to work off the cost of their passage by making pine tar but the project was mismanaged. Royal Governor Hunter ran out of funds for their support and the people were let go in September of 1711. They made their way into the Schoharie Valley and bargained with the Indians for farmland. According to legend, they first saw the Schoharie Valley at the crossing of a small stream. There they halted, listened to a Divine Service, and washed their clothes. Their lice were carried off by the water. Hence the name. A few miles away very near the mouth of Fox Creek, and in the Fox Creek HUC, there is an old stone fort. Called the Old Stone Fort, it is now a museum but was built as a church in 1772. The graves of many early settlers cluster around the building. The tallest of the markers belongs to
David Williams. Resources
Schoharie County figures prominently in New York State history. See Jeptha R. Simms’ History of Schoharie County (1845) conveniently available at http://www.rootsweb.com/~nyschoha/simms1.html. The Palatine immigration to Schoharie and the Mohawk Valley is detailed in Walter Allen Knittle’s 1937 book Early Eighteenth Century Palatine Emigration: A British Government Redemptioners Project to Manufacture Naval Stores. The story has been retold more recently (2004) in Philip Otterness’ Becoming German: The 1709 Palatine Migration to New York. I haven’t read it. The Palatine immigration is treated in a 1958 novel, The Promised Land, by John J. Vrooman. The Vrooman family was already established on the Schoharie when the Palatines arrived. In the book, Fox Creek is written as “Foxen Kill”. A relatively recent and interesting account of the different perceptions of Major Andre’s captors is in Major John Andre and the Three Captors: Class Dynamics and Revolutionary Memory Wars in the Early Republic, 1780-1831 Robert E. Cray, Jr. Journal of the Early Republic, Vol. 17, No. 3
(Autumn, 1997), pp. 371-397. The situation in Revolutionary Westchester County, where Major Andre was captured, is depicted in James Fenimore Cooper’s 1859 novel The Spy, a Tale of the Neutral Ground.
Entry for January 7, 2008
The 71st reunion of the Northeast Friends of the Pleistocene will be hosted in Queensbury, NY this May 30- June 1. Tentatively planned as part of the field trip is a stop at Cohoes Falls where there will be discussions about the formation of the falls, the Cohoes Mastodon (discovered nearby in 1866), the ecology of the area around the time of the mastodon, and possibly ground-penetrating radar data from a large buried pothole close to where the Mastodon was found.
Entries: 1 - 5 of 8
First
|
< Prev
|
Next >
|
Last
|
|
|
|